"Now that we stand on the threshold of the twenty-first-century, the situation is oddly similar. Once again, physicists believe the physical world has been explained, and that no further revolutions lie ahead. Because of prior history, they no longer express this view publicly, but they think it just the same. Some observers have even gone so far as to argue that science as a discipline has finished it's work; that there is nothing important left for Science to discover
- John Hogan - The End of Science."
But just as the late nineteenth century gave hints of what was to come, so the late twentieth century also provides some clues to the future. One of the most important is the interest in so-called Quantum technology. This is an effort on many fronts to create a new technology that utilizes the fundamental nature of subatomic reality, and it promises to revolutionize our ideas of what is possible.
Quantum technology flatly contradicts our common sense ideas of how the world works. It posits a world where computers operate without being turned on and objects are found without looking for them.
-From Time Line - Micheal Chrichton
(This post is not completed yet)
"Welcome to my blog, where we delve into a wide array of impactful issues. While quantum theory is undoubtedly significant, it's just one piece of the puzzle. Here, we explore a diverse range of topics, from our exciting travels and everyday experiences to the pressing realm of politics that shapes our lives. I extend an invitation to you, dear reader, to join me in thought-provoking discussions and share your valuable insights on these matters."
Search This Blog
Sunday, 15 December 2013
Thursday, 22 August 2013
Homosexuality and Buddhism
This comment was in reply to Dr Thrishantha Nanayakkara's article in Colombo Telegraph.
http://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/buddhism-and-the-politics-of-homosexuality/
http://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/buddhism-and-the-politics-of-homosexuality/
I think your idea of Buddhism connected to homosexuality is
erroneous here. Specially in this part
of your article “Therefore, one who gets
attracted to the same sex has no control or ownership of that process starting
from the sight of a person to the feeling of homosexual attraction." I
think we have control over our attractions. What you should have mentioned is
desire and attachment. Buddhism wants us to practice "upeksha" or
take no side of the event or the feeling and don't hold onto anything. The reason why Buddhists or Buddhism does not discriminate
homosexuals as other religions is we accept it is as part of (or associated
with) desire. Whether it is heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual, or for your
craving for any other thing comes under desire and to hold onto someone or a
thing is an attachment. Buddhists practice is to get rid of the very attachment
whatever the form it comes from.
On second part of your article, I am not sure
the connection between the political event and the very thing you say in the
first part. Apart from a Buddhist monk in a political rally and a politician
apologising for it, all that seems a political gimmick from both sides. Papers
and people are talking about completely an unnecessary event.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)