Dear Wayne LaPierre,
I heard you say that "Good guys with guns stop bad guys with
guns". You also called for a national database of the mentally ill and blamed
violent video games and films for portraying murder as a "way of
life" according to the BBC. Normally I don’t trust these new agencies that
much but in this case this was reported elsewhere so it must be true. It could
be true mentally ill and violent video games and films may have instigated some
to kill with guns. But then some of these films use other methods too. But we
don’t see people running with swords or chainsaws killing others.
Mr LaPierre –
Let’s remind ourselves of little bit of American history. I will be
selective here though. You (I mean Americans) have chased out natives from their
home (own areas of habitat) and hunting grounds most of the time killing their
women and children. So you needed the guns. And they may have returned and
fight with their bows, arrows and Tomahawks so you have to defend yourself.
Fair enough, as you need guns then to defend your newly acquired lands. You
sent them to reservoirs and they don’t complain that much now. Most of them are
mixed with everyone else and you made a peace.
Then you had slaves. So stop them
running away you had to shackle them and guard them with guns. So you need the
guns then too. We are against slavery here but this happened many moons ago so
let’s allow it too as a reason to have guns.
And then you need the guns during the American civil war. One part of
the union wanted to keep the slavery other part didn’t. I am quoting here from:
http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war
In the spring of 1861, decades of simmering
tensions between the northern and southern United States over issues including
states' rights versus federal authority, westward expansion and slavery
exploded into the American Civil War (1861-65). The election of the
anti-slavery Republican Abraham Lincoln as president in 1860 caused seven
southern states to secede from the Union to form the Confederate States of
America; four more joined them after the first shots of the Civil War were
fired. Four years of brutal conflict were marked by historic battles at Bull
Run (Manassas), Antietam, Chancellorsville, Gettysburg and Vicksburg, among
others. The War Between the States, as the Civil War was also known, pitted
neighbour against neighbour and in some cases, brother against brother. By the
time it ended in Confederate surrender in 1865, the Civil War proved to be the
costliest war ever fought on American soil, with some 620,000 of 2.4 million
soldiers killed, millions more injured and the population and territory of the
South devastated.”
You uses your guns against your own neighbour according to this. Well
you need the guns then. You have made peace again an the great nation of yours
selected it’s first coloured president twice as well.
Now you are still keeping the guns. I mean the civilians. There is no problem
to Police and armed forces to have guns to keep law and order. Same goes to
farmers and forest rangers. Although I prefer the British police who are walking
without guns and at times heroically give their lives which happened very
recently. You see even though I can justify and even agree that sometimes British
Police should carry guns they don’t. They are that good. They call armed
response units. Ever heard of that? I am sure anyone can buy guns in London
black markets. But people here have faith in their law enforcement agencies.
You seem to have forgotten that you don’t need to defend your land
from rightful owners. They are in reservoirs. You don’t have slaves to guard. You don’t have a civil war. So anyone having
guns think that children and people who queue up to watch a film as legitimate
targets.
If you are against the federal government
you can always do demonstrations. You don’t need guns for that. All of your
media praise your 5 star democracy most of the time. So why not allow those
against the federal government to protest in the streets peacefully. You don’t
need guns for that. Imagine if there will be some Marxist revolutionaries
happened to be in US and organising a riot. They don’t need to instigate army
to get the weapons. They will have all the guns they need at home, legally
owned. What a security lapse? Or your political leaders think that people will
not take arms against the government?
Any way end of the day it’s not our problem. I think If you want to
have guns in homes that’s fine as far as other civilians in other countries
would not follow the American example. I just think in your dollar bills you
have “in God we trust” printed, Was it not better to print “In guns we trust”?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I encourage you to share your thoughts if they are related to the topic being discussed. I review all the comments being posted. The views expressed in comments reflect those of the author and do not necessarily reflect my opinion.
I want to publish all your comments, but I expect comments generally to be courteous. I will not post comments if they:
contain hate speech directed at any particular race, color, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, ethnicity, age, religion, or disability;
contain obscene, indecent, or profane language;
contain threats or defamatory statements;
promote or endorse services or products of yours. (Non-commercial links that are relevant to the topic or another comment are acceptable for posting.)
Thanks